It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
These videos and tutorials shares information on evaluating sources: why is this important? how do I evaluate? what is bias? NOTE: These tutorials are only available for currently enrolled LSU students, faculty, and staff. When attempting to access tutorials from off campus, users will be prompted to login to their myLSU Account.
After watching these tutorials, go ahead and explore the different evaluation techniques shared on this guide (the CRAAP method, ACT UP, and SIFT).
CDC works 24/7 to protect America from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and in the U.S. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights disease and supports communities and citizens to do the same.
The Consumer and Patient Health Information Services Caucus (CAPHIS) of MLA evaluates websites based on the following criteria: credibility, sponsorship/authorship, content, audience, currency (timeliness), disclosure, purpose, links, design, interactivity, and disclaimers. The following websites have been deemed particularly useful (in each area, sites are listed in alphabetical, NOT ranked, order).
The Medical Library Association created this page to help you understand what a doctor or nurse tells you. You’ll find tips on how to understand many health words. The terms on this site were created with the help of the Working Group for Health Literacy, Massachusetts Health Sciences Library Network (MAHSLIN)
Provides resources to find information on health topics, health coverage, and the importance of participating in health research for historically exploited individuals and communities of color. Disponible en Español.
NIH’s mission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability.
Evaluating with the SIFT Method
Evaluating Information with the SIFT Method (The Four Moves)
The SIFT Method, created by Mike Caulfield, is a way to determine if resources are credible. There is so much information available to us at our fingertips, especially with social media and websites. Establishing the credibility of information can be challenging, but the SIFT method was created to help analyze information that you come across, especially news or other online media. Below is an explanation of each step as well as videos created by Caulfield that explain each strategy.
Videos Explaining the SIFT Method by Mike Caulfield
Before you share the article, the video, or react strongly to a headline, pause and ask yourself:
Are you familiar with the website or information source where you're currently reading this information?
What do you know about the reputation of the website or the claim/ being made?
If you don't know, then move on the following steps to figure out if the source and/or the claim/headline/report is trustworthy and factual. Don't read or share media until you know what it is! Throughout this process check your emotions and cognitive bias, and if you get overwhelmed take a second to remember your original purpose and try not to get side-tracked (it's easy to fall down rabbit holes sometimes!)
Move on to the next step...
I: Investigate the Source
You want to know what you're reading before you read it.
Investigate the expertise and agenda of the source to determine its significance and trustworthiness.
Use tools like Wikipedia. You can add the word "wikipedia" to the base of the url or the author's name in the search bar. For example if I wanted to figure out more information about an online news source I could type "theadvocate.com wikipedia" in the search bar to find out more information about the source outside of the source (moving beyond the "About Us" section).
T: Trace Claims, Quotes, and Media Back to the Original Context
What's the original context?
By finding the original source of reporting or the photo in question you can get a more complete picture of the issue or a research finding that is more accurate. Your aim here is to get to the the point where the people doing the writing are the people verifying the facts (the original reporting source).
When reading online sources, pay attention to who they quote as a source and see if you can find more information.
If there are hyperlinks in the source that point towards original studies or reporting go ahead and click on those to follow the chain to the original source.
If there is a bibliography, open up the original reporting sources listed.
Google key terms (or the actual terms) if the source has no mention of the origin.
After you've found the original claim, quote, finding, or news story, ask yourself if it was fairly and accurately represented in the media that you initially came across.